A week’s cool review： banlieue 13 remembers Paul’s remake and leads to controversy

　

Director: Camille Delamarre

Starring: Paul Walker, david belle, Gouchy Boy and catalina denis.

　

Xiaobian score: 6.5 points

　

　

　 　 If you haven’t seen the original banlieue 13, this edition will make you addicted; If you have seen the original, please concentrate on this edition.

　 　　

　

　 　 Why do you want to shoot banlieue 13 again after ten years? This question should be answered by luc besson and Hollywood. What the author considers is how we should treat the remake. After comparing the two versions, I believe most viewers can see that the two films are almost the same, and the remake has only made changes in details. It doesn’t make much sense to comment on which is good or bad. After all, the big framework hasn’t changed at all.

　

　 　 There are two differences between the audience and this film (of course, these two points overlap): First, because of the late action star Paul Walker, who played the righteous policeman in the film. In order to remember Paul Walker, the audience who came to see this film naturally gave high marks, while the real audience did not buy it; The second is the difference between seeing the original and not seeing the original. For the former, the original is irreplaceable, especially the practice of adapting the version to follow suit is not sincere enough. For the audience who have never seen the original, there are enough entertainment elements such as parkour, fighting, anti-government, and the combination of good and evil, and they have gained a pleasant viewing experience.

　

　 　 So have we got the answer now, about how to deal with the remake? Probably still have to use words like "different opinions" and "a thousand readers and a thousand Hamlets" to prevaricate. However, to make an inappropriate metaphor, can we treat the remake like our current lover, and don’t always think about his/her bad, and don’t always compare it with the predecessor?

　

　

　 　 Nowadays, luc besson, a businessman, is often so terrible that he feels that a casual pat is a new film. Compared with the original version, this remake only adds more comic elements of handsome uncle selling corruption, and the action scene of parkour that was very popular in those years has long been insignificant. Finally, the reversal of the joint efforts of uncles to fight corruption is not bad. Perhaps the most attractive part of this film is the last In loving memory of Paul Walker. — — Blasphemy film

　 　　

　 　 The long shot at the beginning is wonderful, the parkour shot is very powerful, and the plot is simple but compact. At last, the villain was washed white too suddenly and went to Paul Walker’s legacy. The black and white commemorative photo after the film was emotional. — — The rise of juvenile school

　

(Text /by Lan Gan)