CCTV News:On the 26th, the Guiding Opinions on Promoting the Reform of Talent Evaluation Mechanism by Classification issued by the General Offices of the General Office of the Central Committee of the CPC and the State Council was published. With "classification" as the key word, the Opinions subdivide the evaluation criteria for talents in different industries, different fields and different job natures, and the evaluation methods of talents such as focusing on papers, emphasizing qualifications and "measuring to the end with a ruler" will change.
"Opinions" implements classified evaluation, based on professional attributes and job requirements, and establishes and improves scientific and reasonable talent evaluation standards covering moral character, knowledge, ability, performance and contribution.
Yu Jiadong, Director of Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security Professional and Technical Personnel Management Department: "In the past, there was a one-size-fits-all phenomenon in talent evaluation. For example, as we always said, we emphasized education, ability, seniority, performance, thesis, contribution, quantity and quality. There are still some problems in the way of evaluation. For the first-line talents at the grassroots level, the positive incentives are not enough and the inclination is not enough. "
Yu Xing ‘an, Dean of China Institute of Personnel Science: "For example, in the field of scientific research, if one is engaged in basic scientific research and the other is engaged in technology development, then his evaluation criteria, evaluation methods and measurement indicators should not be the same."
At the same time, the "Opinions" put forward to pay attention to evaluating talents by ability, performance and contribution. Overcome the tendency of focusing only on academic qualifications, qualifications and papers, rationally set and use evaluation indicators such as papers, solve the problem of "one size fits all" evaluation criteria, and carry out differentiated evaluation of different talents. In addition, the evaluation of scientific spirit, professional ethics and professional ethics will also become an important standard for talent evaluation.
Who will judge? Peer review and social review
In view of the problems existing in the current talent evaluation, such as single subject, weak evaluation professionalism and convergence of evaluation methods, who will evaluate talents after the reform? What is the evaluation cycle?
The "Opinions" first clarified the industry evaluation mechanism based on peer evaluation, and at the same time played the role of multiple subjects such as market and society. According to the characteristics of different talents, different evaluation methods are adopted. Break the restrictions on household registration, region, ownership, identity and personnel relations, and smooth the channels for talent declaration and evaluation in non-public economic organizations, social organizations and emerging occupations. We will improve the methods for reporting and participating in the evaluation of the introduction of overseas high-level talents and foreign talents.
Yu Jiadong, Director of Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security Professional and Technical Personnel Management Department: "Peer-to-peer evaluation, expert evaluation, can integrate social and market-oriented means, rather than a single administrative means."
At the same time, the "Opinions" also clearly set the evaluation and assessment cycle scientifically, explore the implementation of the employment evaluation system, and appropriately extend the evaluation and assessment cycle for basic research talents and young talents.
How to comment? What are you doing? What are you judging?
Science, teaching, literature and health, everyone works in different fields of economic development. The Opinions issued this time are relevant to everyone and realize "what to do and what to evaluate".
Yu Jiadong, Director of Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security Professional and Technical Personnel Management Department: "It mainly mentions six major fields, namely, scientific and technological talents, philosophy and social sciences, cultural and artistic talents, educational talents, medical and health talents, and technical and technical talents. The sixth one is enterprise talents, young talents and grassroots front-line talents."
For scientific and technological talents, the Opinions emphasize the implementation of representative achievement evaluation and pay attention to the combination of individual evaluation and team evaluation. For talents in philosophy, social sciences and culture and art, Opinions are classified and evaluated according to different disciplines and types such as humanities, social sciences, culture and art..
For educational talents, the Opinions regards teaching and educating people as the core content of evaluation, and scientifically sets the evaluation content according to the characteristics of teachers’ responsibilities in different types of universities and different positions. Highlight the evaluation of education and teaching performance, and strengthen the assessment of teaching quality and classroom teaching discipline.
For medical and health personnel, the Opinions strengthen the evaluation of clinical practice ability of medical and health personnel, improve the evaluation index system covering medical ethics, clinical practice, scientific research and teaching, public health services and other factors, and reasonably determine the evaluation focus of talents in different medical and health institutions and different professional positions.
For technical and skilled talents, the Opinions establish and improve the evaluation criteria for engineering and technical talents in different professional fields, and strive to solve the problem that the evaluation criteria are too academic. For skilled talents, we will speed up the construction of multi-level professional standards and improve the multi-evaluation methods such as vocational qualification evaluation, vocational skill level determination and special vocational ability assessment.
In view of enterprises, grassroots frontline and young talents, the Opinions increase incentives and expand career development space.
Yu Xing ‘an, Dean of China Institute of Personnel Science: "For a comrade who works at the grassroots level, how can you ask him to have so many papers, and he has such a high degree and such a deep qualification? Therefore, I am afraid that we should relax some standards in the evaluation of comrades working at the grassroots level, so as to really attract our vast number of talents, the vast number of science, education, culture and health workers, and go to the front line to do services and make contributions. "
How to manage? Unit leadership will have supporting policies.
How to implement the reform? The Opinions clearly respect the leading role of employers, and a number of reform supporting programs will be launched in the future. The Opinions clarify that the leading role of employers will be respected in talent evaluation, the talent evaluation authority will be reasonably defined and decentralized, and qualified universities, research institutes and other enterprises and institutions will be promoted to independently carry out evaluation work, promote the organic connection between talent evaluation and training, use and motivation, and maximize the evaluation efficiency. In addition, the "Opinions" clearly need to improve the market-oriented socialized management service system, actively cultivate and develop social organizations and professional institutions for talent evaluation, and undertake the government’s talent evaluation functions in an orderly manner.
Yu Xing ‘an, Dean of China Institute of Personnel Science: "To untie talents, we should delegate power to the employer, so that the employer can truly have the autonomy of employing people, and can make independent arrangements in terms of post setting, recruitment of personnel, and salary distribution, including performance evaluation."
In the next step, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security will work with relevant parties to study and formulate the division of tasks in the Opinions, and formulate supporting policies for the reform of talent evaluation mechanisms in the fields of science and technology, philosophy and social sciences, culture and art, education, medical care and technical skills.
Yu Jiadong, Director of Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security Professional and Technical Personnel Management Department: "It should be combined with the implementation of the reform opinions of the professional title system and the reform opinions of the vocational qualification system. The evaluation should be unified with the training and development of talents in front and the use of incentives for talents in the back. "